Beautiful nightview, as a matter of fact, this picture look better than our bare eyesight!
— Kinosaki Night 11.08.2007
August 20, 2007 at 1:57 pm (OECD)
Netherlands: government are funding the jobless on the “development programmes” such as…
State funds tarot card readings for jobless
Monday 20 August 2007Tarot card readers, astrologers and spiritually-based ‘personal development programmes’ are being given government funding as part of efforts to get people back to work, the Volkskrant reports on Monday.
*I start to imagine what would happen if Malaysia government also consider to sponsor the same funding for university unemployed to take the course on “bomoh“, Chinese “spirit medium”…
Finland: 57% of Finn said they would not buy genetically modified (GM) food…
Most Finns Would Pass on GM Food
Published 19.08.2007, 17.01The majority of Finns would not buy food which used genetically modified (GM) fodder or ingredients in its preparation. According to a survey by the newspaper Aamulehti, 57 percent of respondents said they would not purchase such food, even if it were produced in Finland.
Norway: Nothing much is interesting today… the scandal of Oslo Mayor… bla bla bla… move on to next.
Sweden: Immigrant women have higher rish in child labour…
‘Healthcare worse for immigrant women’
Published: 20th August 2007 07:57 CETWomen born in countries outside Sweden suffer more complications when giving birth than Swedish women. Eva Robertson, a researcher at the Karolinska Institute, says that the problem stems from discrimination in the healthcare system.
Women born in sub-Saharan Africa and in Latin America were 50 percent more likely than Swedish women to experience complications during labour.
Women from Iran and the rest of Asia meanwhile ran a 30 percent higher risk of labour difficulties than women born in Sweden.
Denmark: politicians use city’s fund to see Michael Moore’s presentation…
Michael Moore’s advice costly for taxpayers
20.08.2007Dozens of municipal politicians have used their city’s funds to purchase tickets to a presentation by American documentary film director Michael Moore.
At DKK 1600 (USD=290) per person, the total for the big wigs’ night out comes to DKK 112,000. Sønderborg’s mayor, Jan Prokopek Jensen, said Moore’s presentation – which includes a viewing of his latest film about the American health care system, ‘Sicko’ – can be ‘inspirational’ for the city’s businesses and government.
August 20, 2007 at 1:52 am (Music Video)
Hehey, one of my favourite Karaoke must-sing song!
August 19, 2007 at 4:47 am (MeThink)
… Or rather I created a South Park character like based on the software/program here: SP-Studio.
That’s what I believe in how should I look like 😛
August 18, 2007 at 8:21 am (Economic, OECD, Statistic)
Out from nowhere, I have a curious check to see if the population (in log10 form) will have any correlation with GDP and Gini in OECD countries.
a) Population vs GDP per capita [2001]
Rsquare=0.145 at p=0.0546.
If the so-called 2 outlier points (the “+” is iceland, “x” is US) are excluded from the graph, the Rsquare will increase to 0.301 (moderately strong) at p=0.0055, as shown below:
Note: The colour of each point represent the GDP bracket: red – GDP <$ 15,000, black- $15, 000 <GDP <$25,000, blue -GDP> $ 25,000
b) Population vs Gini [2000]
Rsquare=0.162 at p=0.051. However, let’s say if Luxembourg’s point is excluded, the rsquare will increase to 0.280 (p=0.009), as shown below:
So, is there any reason for why higher population has lower GDP per capita and higher Gini, i.e. income inequality? Or should there be any explanation at all? Could it be that if the population is small, it will be more managable? I mean it could not be that because a country’s GDP is low, therefore they want higher population? Any input?
Source:
1) Population: World Bank, 2000
2) GDP per capita: OECD
3) Gini 2000: OECD
August 16, 2007 at 1:49 am (Picture)
August 14, 2007 at 2:43 am (Picture)
Taken on 04.08.2007, at Hanamikoji, near Gion, Kyoto, Japan.
Can know more about them here:
Immortal Geisha Forum
August 13, 2007 at 8:16 am (Malaysia, OECD, Statistic)
Let’s have a look at intentional homicide/murder around OECD countries and Malaysia:
a) Total Offences – Intentional homicide reported in year 2003 and the table for year 2000-2003
Year 2003
Iceland – 1
Luxembourg – 3
Ireland – 45
Austria – 50
Norway – 51
Denmark – 66
Finland – 103
New Zealand – 104
Greece – 122
Switzerland – 187
Sweden – 189
Portugal – 271
Australia – 341
Spain – 498
Canada – 549
Malaysia – 565
Italy – 772
Germany – 829
France – 987
Japan – 1452
UK: England & Wales – 1737
US – 16528
b) Offences per 1 000 000 population – Intentional homicide reported in year 2003 and the table for year 2000-2003
Year 2003
Iceland 3.5
Luxembourg 6.7
Austria 8.0
Netherlands 9.7
Germany 10.0
Greece 11.1
Norway 11.1
Ireland 11.3
Japan 11.4
Spain 11.9
Denmark 12.3
Italy 13.4
Belgium 15.0
France 16.4
Australia 17.2
Canada 17.4
Finland 19.8
Sweden 21.1
Malaysia 23.1
Switzerland 25.5
New Zealand 25.9
Portugal 26.0
UK: England & Wales 32.9
US 56.8
Sources:
a) homicide cases: OECD countries from European Sourcebook and cross-checked with some of the individual country’s statistic department. Malaysia – Royal Police Department.
b) population: World Bank.
August 12, 2007 at 9:30 am (Picture)
August 10, 2007 at 9:17 am (Malaysia, Travel)
Well, I think they do deserve congratulations for their good work is important to maintain Malaysia’s image around the world:
a) Malaysia Airline System (MAS)’s rank in the World Airline Awards 2007
Airline Of The Year 2007: #6
Best Cabin Staff: #1 (!!!!)
Best Catering – Economy Class: #3
Best First Class – #4
Best Bussiness Class – #4
Best Economy Class – #2
b) Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) in World Airport Awards 2007
Top 10 Airports in the world for 2007 : #5 (improve from #6 in year 2006)
Immigration Service: #2 [ohhh, actually this comes out as a surprise because I was reading some complaints about Malaysia’s immigration service at KLIA not long ago. But whatever their complaints were, surprisingly Malaysia’s one is voted by passengers, after Zurich, but better than Singapore (another surprise there :P)]
August 10, 2007 at 3:14 am (Picture)
August 10, 2007 at 3:09 am (Christian, Math!)
Instapundit ask the reader (e.g. me) to do the math exercise:
Well, 10 000/day will make it 3.65 million/year, and 200 ÷ 3.65 = 54.79 years. So half a century (50 years) to reach 200 million, as according to …
So it kinda left me wonder what could make Instapundit surprised if these predictions bore out: the 200 million in half century part, or the 10 000/day part?