<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for small-m</title>
	<atom:link href="http://micpohling.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://micpohling.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>small-m half-baked statistic, own pictures and collection of news stuff :P</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on WVS: Life Satisfaction by Marital Status by Natalie</title>
		<link>http://micpohling.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/wvs-life-satisfaction-by-marital-status/#comment-2069</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micpohling.wordpress.com/?p=962#comment-2069</guid>
		<description>Hi micpohling,

Thanks for featuring Swivel graphs in your blog!

Would you be interested in putting a Swivel badge on your website?  It's just one more way to tell the world that you love data!  If you're interested, you can get your own Swivel data badge here: http://www.swivel.com/pantry/i_swivel

Natalie Glatzel
Features Editor
Swivel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi micpohling,</p>
<p>Thanks for featuring Swivel graphs in your blog!</p>
<p>Would you be interested in putting a Swivel badge on your website?  It&#8217;s just one more way to tell the world that you love data!  If you&#8217;re interested, you can get your own Swivel data badge here: <a href="http://www.swivel.com/pantry/i_swivel" rel="nofollow">http://www.swivel.com/pantry/i_swivel</a></p>
<p>Natalie Glatzel<br />
Features Editor<br />
Swivel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ESS 2006: Immigrants make country worse or better place to live by Maxi</title>
		<link>http://micpohling.wordpress.com/2008/03/01/ess-2006-immigrants-make-country-worse-or-better-place-to-live/#comment-2068</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micpohling.wordpress.com/?p=737#comment-2068</guid>
		<description>White inmigrants = better
Other = Bad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>White inmigrants = better<br />
Other = Bad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weekly Highlight: 15.07.2008 by Netherlands &#187; Weekly Highlight: 15.07.2008</title>
		<link>http://micpohling.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/weekly-highlight-15072008/#comment-2066</link>
		<dc:creator>Netherlands &#187; Weekly Highlight: 15.07.2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micpohling.wordpress.com/?p=957#comment-2066</guid>
		<description>[...] Weekly Highlight: 15.07.2008Although Denmark has had a strong economy, falling unemployment and rising private consumption, its GDP per capita was overtaken by Canada, Australia, Ireland and the Netherlands in the period from 1996 to 2008. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Weekly Highlight: 15.07.2008Although Denmark has had a strong economy, falling unemployment and rising private consumption, its GDP per capita was overtaken by Canada, Australia, Ireland and the Netherlands in the period from 1996 to 2008. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weekly Highlight: 15.07.2008 by Denmark &#187; Open Question: why did beowulf go to denmark?</title>
		<link>http://micpohling.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/weekly-highlight-15072008/#comment-2065</link>
		<dc:creator>Denmark &#187; Open Question: why did beowulf go to denmark?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micpohling.wordpress.com/?p=957#comment-2065</guid>
		<description>[...] Weekly Highlight: 15.07.2008Denmark fell to 11th place in May 2008 from 7th place in 1996 in terms of gross domestic product per capita, adjusted for purchasing power, according to figures from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Weekly Highlight: 15.07.2008Denmark fell to 11th place in May 2008 from 7th place in 1996 in terms of gross domestic product per capita, adjusted for purchasing power, according to figures from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Malaysia: Crime Statistic 2000-2006 (I) by Kay</title>
		<link>http://micpohling.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/malaysia-crime-statistic-2000-2006-i/#comment-2064</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micpohling.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/malaysia-crime-statistic-2000-2006-i/#comment-2064</guid>
		<description>This is useful. Where do you get it? any latest stats on crime rates esp. by states in Malaysia?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is useful. Where do you get it? any latest stats on crime rates esp. by states in Malaysia?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OECD Social Protection 1994 - 2005: Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain by Italy &#187; Instituto Pendola</title>
		<link>http://micpohling.wordpress.com/2008/07/13/oecd-social-protection-1994-2005-greece-italy-portugal-spain/#comment-2063</link>
		<dc:creator>Italy &#187; Instituto Pendola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micpohling.wordpress.com/?p=916#comment-2063</guid>
		<description>[...] OECD Social Protection 1994 - 2005: Greece, Italy, Portugal, SpainTotal expenditure on social protection (% of GDP), Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain. 1994, 22.1, 25.3, 21.3, 22.8. 1995, 19.9, 24.2, 21.0, 21.6. 1996, 20.5, 24.3, 20.2, 21.5. 1997, 20.8, 24.9, 20.3, 20.8. 1998, 21.7, 24.6, 20.9, 20.2 &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OECD Social Protection 1994 - 2005: Greece, Italy, Portugal, SpainTotal expenditure on social protection (% of GDP), Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain. 1994, 22.1, 25.3, 21.3, 22.8. 1995, 19.9, 24.2, 21.0, 21.6. 1996, 20.5, 24.3, 20.2, 21.5. 1997, 20.8, 24.9, 20.3, 20.8. 1998, 21.7, 24.6, 20.9, 20.2 &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OECD Social Protection 1994 - 2005: France, Germany, Netherlands by Pages tagged "france"</title>
		<link>http://micpohling.wordpress.com/2008/07/12/oecd-social-protection-1994-2005-france-germany-netherlands/#comment-2062</link>
		<dc:creator>Pages tagged "france"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 05:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micpohling.wordpress.com/?p=915#comment-2062</guid>
		<description>[...] bookmarks tagged france OECD Social Protection 1994 - 2005: France, German...&#160;saved by 3 others  &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;Henriatta2468 bookmarked on 07/13/08 &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bookmarks tagged france OECD Social Protection 1994 - 2005: France, German&#8230;&nbsp;saved by 3 others  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Henriatta2468 bookmarked on 07/13/08 | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Malaysia: Road Accidents Statistic 2000-2006 by Choon Heng</title>
		<link>http://micpohling.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/malaysia-road-accidents-statistic-2000-2006/#comment-2055</link>
		<dc:creator>Choon Heng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micpohling.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/malaysia-road-accidents-statistic-2000-2006/#comment-2055</guid>
		<description>Announcing MUST Road Safety Seminar 28 July 2008
http://www.must.edu.my/roadsafety/register.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Announcing MUST Road Safety Seminar 28 July 2008<br />
<a href="http://www.must.edu.my/roadsafety/register.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.must.edu.my/roadsafety/register.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Picture: Water Lily in Macro by kishu</title>
		<link>http://micpohling.wordpress.com/2008/07/01/picture-water-lily-in-macro/#comment-2054</link>
		<dc:creator>kishu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micpohling.wordpress.com/2008/07/01/picture-water-lily-in-macro/#comment-2054</guid>
		<description>nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weekly Highlight: 08.07.2008 by Thomas Laprade</title>
		<link>http://micpohling.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/weekly-highlight-08072008/#comment-2053</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Laprade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micpohling.wordpress.com/?p=953#comment-2053</guid>
		<description>An alternative to smoking bans

 
It is clear that separation of smokers from non-smokers combined

with air exchange technology is a complete solution to this largely

artificial problem. All it takes is regulating authorities setting the

standards for indoor air quality on passive smoke, and the technology

does the rest. Such air quality standards are common in industrial

and environmental contexts. But, to date, no country in the world has

set them for smoking areas. It seems clear that the reasons are not

scientific, nor are they economic or technical: they are political.


As to the annoyance of smoking, a compromise between smokers and non-smokers 
can be reached, through setting a quality standard and the use of modern 
ventilation technology.

Air ventilation can easily create a comfortable environment that removes not 
just passive smoke, but also and especially the potentially serious 
contaminants that are independent from smoking.

Thomas Laprade
480 Rupert St.
Thunder Bay, Ont.

http://smokersclubinc.com
http://pasan.thetruthisalie.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An alternative to smoking bans</p>
<p>It is clear that separation of smokers from non-smokers combined</p>
<p>with air exchange technology is a complete solution to this largely</p>
<p>artificial problem. All it takes is regulating authorities setting the</p>
<p>standards for indoor air quality on passive smoke, and the technology</p>
<p>does the rest. Such air quality standards are common in industrial</p>
<p>and environmental contexts. But, to date, no country in the world has</p>
<p>set them for smoking areas. It seems clear that the reasons are not</p>
<p>scientific, nor are they economic or technical: they are political.</p>
<p>As to the annoyance of smoking, a compromise between smokers and non-smokers<br />
can be reached, through setting a quality standard and the use of modern<br />
ventilation technology.</p>
<p>Air ventilation can easily create a comfortable environment that removes not<br />
just passive smoke, but also and especially the potentially serious<br />
contaminants that are independent from smoking.</p>
<p>Thomas Laprade<br />
480 Rupert St.<br />
Thunder Bay, Ont.</p>
<p><a href="http://smokersclubinc.com" rel="nofollow">http://smokersclubinc.com</a><br />
<a href="http://pasan.thetruthisalie.com" rel="nofollow">http://pasan.thetruthisalie.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
